Some Known Details About Wrongful Dismissal Compensation

That is where Lublin & Whitten, Toronto Employment and Labour Lawyers will help. Our team of leading attorneys is always relied on to their counsel on all kinds of workplace disputes, including wrongful and constructive dismissals, human rights and harassment lawsuits, severance package negotiations, contracts and post-employment restrictions and more.

Most importantly , we get results! Dont take our word for this our client testimonials are only a few examples. Need advice Call the Labour & Employment Lawyers with experience at 416-640- 2667. We take calls before 8:30 p.m.

Once I was let go from my former position, I was at a loss. A telephone on his staff and Lior was a move in the right direction. His support staff and lior were educated and really understanding of my plight. I understand that there are choices to moving on and simply taking what is provided, while I hope never to use his services again.

At a young age I was forced to sue my insurance company dependent on the denial of a promise and that I had been referred to Sivan Tumarkin. During the Entire Procedure

Our Discrimination Law Firm Diaries

He gave comfort to me knowing that I was in good hands. Not only did he win the scenario, it was fast and I was really satisfied with the compensation. Above all

He was very detailed and explained me every step along the way. I heard a great deal from this process and I am pleased to say it left me a stronger person



I felt I was being wrongfully treated at my job of 18 years, and that I had some guidance. I called 2 other employment lawyers and they called me . I called Samfiru Tumarkin's office they had me at the day.

Jon was upfront approachable, easy to talk with, friendly and caring. He has great understanding of the employment law, He even took time for details and then follow up. I am very happy with the outcome, and could strongly recommend Jon as an employment lawyer.

The Buzz on Labour Rights Attorney

Employment law is that the set of rules regulating the workplace. Legislation, on the other hand, is that the set of principles regulating the unionized workplace.

Employment law principles generally favour the employee. That is because employers usually have better sophistication and bargaining power relative to worker vulnerability. In check out this site this respect, the employee is normally favoured by the sympathies of judges as well.



Employment law takes its cue from two regions of law: laws and law. Legislation consists of legislation passed by governments down, and law is judge made law. In this regard, legislation is dormant, while the common law is dynamic. The frequent law permits employees and employers alike to make publication arguments in front of a judge and evolve labour legislation with time, whereas laws is put into stone until it isnt. .

Employment laws is concerned with minimum protections for employees only. These laws include labour criteria (i.e. wages, hoursand overtime, statutory note, Web Site etc..   The Employment Standards Act), individual rights (i.e. discrimination in the workplace, harassment etc.. The Human Rights Code), occupational health and safety (i.e. work secure protections, etc. ). The Occupational Health and Safety Act), pay equity (i.e.

Wrongful Dismissal - An Overview

The Pay Equity Act) and employees compensation (i.e. insurance for injured employees, etc.. These statute-based legislation have their very own complaint processes which do not require the requirement of a professional lawyer to create a criticism. For instance, whenever an employee isn't being paid overtime, they all need to do is telephone the Ministry of Labour, and the Ministry of Labour investigates and prosecutes the employer on behalf of the employee. .

Conversely, employment law is concerned with the contractual rights of workers and companies. Note that a real, written down job contract is never required  the common law suggests that an employment contract on all servants and masters, and the only means to sabotage the implication of common law terms implied within an employment contract on office parties is to expressly contract from those terms.

This is significant because employment contracts, express or implied, offer much more rewarding rights to employees than that of legislation. By way of example, an implied employment contract gives a worker the right to up to 30 or so months of notice of termination, whereas legislation like the Employment Standards Act provides only a week of notice for each year of service, up to a max of 8 weeks! .

Thus, legislation like the Employment Standards Act is just to protect the vulnerable, low paid worker who isn't able to afford an employment lawyer. That is because a worker who complains to the Ministry of Labour is termination dismissal entitled only to a set maximum quantity of money set by legislation, which is usually a pittance compared to the common law.